Monolithic Powervs.Qualcomm
MPWR vs QCOM · both in Chips & accelerators, part of the AI & digital infrastructure value chain: Designs and builds the processors, accelerators and memory that train and run AI.
Qualcomm is about 2.6× larger than Monolithic Power by market cap; Qualcomm trades at the lower P/E (20.0 vs 87.1); year to date, Monolithic Power leads (+57.3% vs +3.5%).
Side by side
| MPWR | QCOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $70.1B | $185B |
| Price | $1,369.80 | $176.01 |
| Today | −3.9% | −0.6% |
| Return YTD | +57.3% | +3.5% |
| Return 1Y | +50.8% | +7.0% |
| Since July 2, 2026 | +6.3% | −0.1% |
| P/E | 87.1 | 20.0 |
| P/S | 21.4 | 4.2 |
| P/B | 18.0 | 6.7 |
Data as of 2026-10-08 · updates daily after U.S. close
Since July 2, 2026: the change in the closing price from the first session with a close for both companies. Sectivia records these closes itself, starting June 26, 2026.
The two companies
Monolithic PowerMPWR
Everything here is power delivery: the chips and modules that feed processors in AI server racks, with cars and industrial equipment taking the same parts.
Full MPWR profile →QualcommQCOM
Snapdragon made Qualcomm the reference point in mobile silicon. Its NPUs run models on the handset or PC itself, and the same platforms now go into cars.
Full QCOM profile →More MPWR & QCOM comparisons
Other head-to-heads in the Chips & accelerators segment.