NetAppvs.Pure Storage
NTAP vs PSTG · both in Data centers, part of the AI & digital infrastructure value chain: Servers, networking, optics and data center capacity that tie AI infrastructure together.
NetApp is about 2.0× larger than Pure Storage by market cap; NetApp trades at the lower P/E (31.9 vs 119.1); year to date, Pure Storage leads (+127.8% vs +115.8%).
Side by side
| NTAP | PSTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $45.3B | $22.4B |
| Price | $237.15 | — |
| Today | +2.6% | — |
| Return YTD | +115.8% | +127.8% |
| Return 1Y | +89.7% | +20.7% |
| Since June 26, 2026 | +55.6% | +60.3% |
| P/E | 31.9 | 119.1 |
| P/S | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| P/B | 30.3 | 15.5 |
Data as of 2026-10-09 · updates daily after U.S. close
Since June 26, 2026: the change in the closing price, from the daily closes Sectivia records itself since that date.
The two companies
NetAppNTAP
Keeps enterprise data on flash arrays and moves it between on-premises kit and the cloud; AI workloads are the newer source of demand.
Full NTAP profile →Pure StoragePSTG
All-flash arrays for data centers, sold as a subscription service.
Full PSTG profile →More NTAP & PSTG comparisons
Other head-to-heads in the Data centers segment.