Curtiss-Wrightvs.Centrus Energy
CW vs LEU · both in Nuclear energy & uranium, part of the Energy, grid & critical infrastructure value chain: CO2-free baseload: uranium supply, fuel, reactor technology and small modular reactors (tags mark the role).
Curtiss-Wright is about 6.9× larger than Centrus Energy by market cap; Curtiss-Wright trades at the lower P/E (47.6 vs 76.7); year to date, Curtiss-Wright leads (+11.6% vs −27.0%).
Side by side
| CW | LEU | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $25.7B | $3.7B |
| Price | $609.71 | $193.39 |
| Today | −0.9% | +9.2% |
| Return YTD | +11.6% | −27.0% |
| Return 1Y | +27.9% | −5.0% |
| P/E | 47.6 | 76.7 |
| P/S | 7.0 | 7.8 |
| P/B | 9.3 | 4.4 |
Data as of 2026-08-26 · updates daily after U.S. close
The two companies
Curtiss-WrightCW
Pumps and valves that go inside naval reactors, plus defense electronics and industrial actuators. Commercial nuclear plants draw on the same components. More than a century of industrial history sits behind the company.
Full CW profile →Centrus EnergyLEU
Enriches uranium, including the HALEU grade that next-generation small modular reactors require.
Full LEU profile →More CW & LEU comparisons
Other head-to-heads in the Nuclear energy & uranium segment.