Curtiss-Wrightvs.Oklo
CW vs OKLO · both in Nuclear energy & uranium, part of the Energy, grid & critical infrastructure value chain: CO2-free baseload: uranium supply, fuel, reactor technology and small modular reactors (tags mark the role).
Curtiss-Wright is about 2.9× larger than Oklo by market cap; year to date, Curtiss-Wright leads (+0.4% vs −48.7%).
Side by side
| CW | OKLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $18.7B | $6.4B |
| Price | $507.29 | $34.57 |
| Today | −0.4% | −6.1% |
| Return YTD | +0.4% | −48.7% |
| Return 1Y | −0.1% | −72.5% |
| Since July 2, 2026 | −33.3% | −34.0% |
| P/E | 34.5 | — |
| P/S | 5.1 | — |
| P/B | 6.7 | 2.0 |
Data as of 2026-10-08 · updates daily after U.S. close
Since July 2, 2026: the change in the closing price from the first session with a close for both companies. Sectivia records these closes itself, starting June 26, 2026.
The two companies
Curtiss-WrightCW
Pumps and valves that go inside naval reactors, plus defense electronics and industrial actuators. Commercial nuclear plants draw on the same components. More than a century of industrial history sits behind the company.
Full CW profile →OkloOKLO
Aurora, its microreactor design, is meant to be sold as electricity rather than as hardware, with data centers the intended buyers. Nothing is operating commercially yet.
Full OKLO profile →More CW & OKLO comparisons
Other head-to-heads in the Nuclear energy & uranium segment.