Curtiss-Wrightvs.NuScale Power
CW vs SMR · both in Nuclear energy & uranium, part of the Energy, grid & critical infrastructure value chain: CO2-free baseload: uranium supply, fuel, reactor technology and small modular reactors (tags mark the role).
Curtiss-Wright is about 8.5× larger than NuScale Power by market cap; year to date, Curtiss-Wright leads (+36.9% vs −36.2%).
Side by side
| CW | SMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $28B | $3.3B |
| Price | $754.76 | $9.04 |
| Today | −0.7% | +0.1% |
| Return YTD | +36.9% | −36.2% |
| Return 1Y | +59.1% | −74.9% |
| P/E | 54.7 | — |
| P/S | 7.8 | 177.0 |
| P/B | 10.6 | 2.8 |
Data as of 2026-07-11 · updates daily after U.S. close
The two companies
Curtiss-WrightCW
Components and systems for naval nuclear reactors, commercial nuclear power and defense platforms — more than a century of industrial history.
Full CW profile →NuScale PowerSMR
Developer of small modular reactors (SMR) — one of the most advanced listed pure-play SMR ventures in the US.
Full SMR profile →More comparisons in Nuclear energy & uranium
See where CW and SMR sit in the full Energy, grid & critical infrastructure map — every segment from suppliers to end markets.Open the Energy value chain →